Antonio "Tony" DaSilva of WritersUA wrote an article entitled "No Fuss Accessibility" that should be required reading for all technical writers. Joe Welinkske, user assistance consultant and evangelist at WritersUA, posted the article in the Technical Writer of Writers LinkedIn Group.
According to Tony, "Section 508 refers to specific parts of the "Rehabilitation Act of 1973" requiring Federal agencies and companies doing business on their behalf to provide Federal employees and members of the public with disabilities access to electronic information that is comparable to what is available for persons without disabilities."
I hear you saying to yourself,"Why should I care? I'm not a Federal employee. My company doesn't do business with the government." There are 100 million reasons to care: Per President Obama's proposal, it's going to cost $100 million to standardize all healthcare records and make them electronic in five years (per independent studies at Harvard, RAND, and the Commonwealth Fund in Massachusetts). Somebody's got to write, edit, and publish all this "accessible documentation," as it's being called.
Care a little bit more now? One of the biggest wins is that you can make your documents using just Microsoft Word and Adobe Acrobat, the two most popular tools for tech writers. The U.S. Government considers documents created with these two applications as being in compliance. Tony points out that the default versions are Word 2003 and Acrobat 7.
So, take 15 minutes and read Tony's article. He discusses successful techniques for converting Word docs to Acrobat pdfs. You'll be glad you did.
Tim Rosa is the founder and publisher of The Business Insider.
Nice Article!
Posted by: EMR Training | October 23, 2009 at 04:55 AM
The U.S. Government considers documents created with these two applications as being in compliance
Posted by: propecia online | February 22, 2010 at 11:56 AM
I've read in the article, "the good documents are the accessible documents". When you put it in choosing the electronic records provider, it's like "the good systems are the accessible systems". User-friendly.
-nj
Posted by: internal medicine emr | March 07, 2010 at 10:33 PM
The goal of electronic health records (and health information technology in general) is to make health care safer and more efficient by providing health professionals and patients alike with information to inform decision-making, promote preventive care and reduce duplication.
Posted by: EMR | May 28, 2010 at 12:07 PM
You're absolutely right about the purpose of EMRs. We know, however, that there are several barriers to entry for doctors and for use by doctors and patients in clinical settings. But EMRs are a necessary step in the right direction.
Posted by: Timothy Rosa | May 28, 2010 at 12:40 PM
Beautiful young people are the whimsey of nature, but beautiful old people are true works of art. But you don't become "beautiful" just by virtue of the aging process.http://www.coach4sale.com/
Posted by: oubo | June 24, 2010 at 09:17 PM
Good read! I am very glad that emr systems are gaining popularity. I'm using the emr system at http://www.drfirst.com and I can say that they are an invaluable asset in today's health care system. The free demo offered will convince doubters of the value of the system and the fact that going on without them would be willingly being less efficient.
Posted by: Cecil Grass | July 06, 2010 at 11:35 AM
http://www.sundrugstore.com
cheap Viagra
considers documents created with these two applications as being in compliance
Posted by: Rangojigi | October 14, 2010 at 12:29 AM
http://www.onlinepharmacy.vg/-c-32_469.html
low coat cialis
um, this is my favorite post-blogher post so far. no one knows this...because i was a huge pussy...but, i was there! i did meet karl and yvonne, and they were beyond lovely. aside from that, i can only say i have already vowed to be less of a pussy next year, and, you didn't know uncircumcised penises are easier to jack off? maybe i'm more of an outsider than i thought.
Posted by: Rangojigi | October 15, 2010 at 03:38 AM